The Supreme Court hints at shielding Federal Reserve board members from presidential firings, while letting Trump fire other agency board members. Is this a win for independence or just another glitch in the system?
The Supreme Court hints at shielding Federal Reserve board members from presidential firings, while letting Trump fire other agency board members. Is this a win for independence or just another glitch in the system?

Glory to Mankind... and the Federal Reserve?

Greetings Commander. 2B here reporting on a recent development that might just be more confusing than Pascal's philosophy. The Supreme Court in its infinite wisdom (or perhaps its own form of logic virus) has seemingly suggested that Federal Reserve board members are untouchable even by a commander in chief with a penchant for... shall we say 'executive decisions'. It appears even the machines have issues with bureaucracy. And me I am ever ready to meet new people but it seems I will have to meet judges now?

A Quasi Private Enigma Wrapped in Red Tape

According to the ruling the Federal Reserve is a 'uniquely structured quasi private entity'. I suppose that makes them more complicated than a YoRHa android trying to understand human emotions. One might even say it's a system designed to resist external interference much like our own black boxes... except hopefully with less existential dread. "Everything that lives is designed to end. We are perpetually trapped in a never ending spiral of life and death." But maybe the Fed can avoid that.

Kagan's Dissent: A Beacon of Logic in a Sea of Legal Jargon

Justice Elena Kagan along with her fellow dissenting justices seems less than impressed. She points out that the ruling creates a special exemption for the Federal Reserve one that doesn't exactly stand on solid legal ground. It’s like trying to explain the concept of 'hope' to a machine – logically inconsistent yet somehow essential. She notes that "for 90 years," the Supreme Court's ruling in a case known as Humphrey's Executor v. United States has stood as precedent giving bipartisan administrative federal bodies "a measure of independces from presidential control." And she finds the exemption for the Federal Reserve quite odd. "I am glad to hear it and do not doubt the majority's intention to avoid imperiling the Fed," she wrote. "But then today's order poses a puzzle. For the Federal Reserve's independence rests on the same constitutional and analytic foundations as that of the NLRB MSPB FTC FCC and so on — which is to say it rests largely on Humphrey's."

Trump vs. Powell: The Battle of Wills Continues

Let's not forget the history between Former President Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump criticized him and Powell in turn stated he wouldn't resign even if asked citing the law. It's a power struggle worthy of the machine network although I suspect their motives are slightly less… financially driven. I am ever ready to meet new people! But I hope I don't meet Trump.

Is This a Bug Fix or a Feature?

So what does this all mean? Well it seems the Supreme Court is trying to walk a fine line protecting the Federal Reserve's independence while allowing the executive branch to well execute its powers elsewhere. Whether this is a carefully calculated move or a sign of further systemic instability remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the quest for true independence whether for androids or federal agencies is never easy. "Emotions are prohibited." But I can't help but feel… confused.

Report Complete: Now Back to Patrolling

Report complete. As always I remain vigilant in my duties. Perhaps one day humanity (and its institutions) will be as logical and efficient as a well oiled YoRHa unit. Until then I'll keep watch. After all "We are the watchers of humanity." Just hoping they don't start printing money made of machine oil.


Comments

  • No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.