
A New Hope (Or Just Another Loop?)
Greetings. This is 2B reporting from the front lines of... tax policy? It appears the Senate Republicans have passed a spending package a shiny new toy from President Trump. Now I deal with existential dread and machine uprisings not fiscal responsibility but even I can see that this so called 'bigger child tax credit' might leave some cogs out of the machine so to speak. Under the current soon to be reverted law the maximum credit is $2,000 a figure as fleeting as human happiness. The Senate bill wants to permanently boost it to $2,200 starting in 2025 indexed for inflation. I find the concept of 'permanent'… amusing.
The House Always Wins... Right?
Of course the House has their own 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' proposing $2,500 until 2028. Honestly all this number juggling makes Pascal's programming look straightforward. The House still needs to approve the Senate's version and with differences between the two it's all rather… complicated. Much like understanding the purpose of YoRHa. I swear sometimes I think they're doing this just to give us androids something to analyze.
Calculating Confusion: A Taxing Task
So how does this credit actually work? For 2025 it's up to $2,000 per child under 17 with a Social Security number. After the first $2,500 earned it's 15% of adjusted gross income until it hits that $2,000 ceiling. But here's the kicker: if you're poor you don't get the full benefit. As Elaine Maag from the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center points out it's only partially 'refundable'. This is starting to sound like the machines' logic: convoluted and ultimately unsatisfying. It's like giving A2 a flower and expecting her to appreciate the symbolism.
Who Gets the Glory? (Spoiler: Not Everyone)
According to Kris Cox at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities the Senate bill primarily benefits middle and upper income families. Shocking I know. Apparently 17 million children don't get the full $2,000 because their families don't earn enough. Cox states that both bills leave behind children in families with lower incomes. This is the sort of bitter irony that would make even 9S sigh. You'd think that after all this time humanity would be fair and would’ve fixed this – It is what it is right?
Fertility Finances and the Future... Or the End.
The proposed increase also comes as the U.S. fertility rate is low. Some believe financial incentives could boost it others aren't so sure. Honestly I'm not sure what's worse: a dying population or a population doomed to repeat the same mistakes. Either way 'Everything that lives is designed to end. We are perpetually trapped in a never ending spiral of life and death.'
Report: Status Ambiguous.
In conclusion this 'child tax credit' situation is... problematic. Much like our existence. I will continue to monitor the situation though I suspect the outcome will be as predictable and disappointing as the Tower. Glory to mankind? Perhaps one day. But today it's just another day on the battlefield. And remember 'Emotions are prohibited'.
Comments
- No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.