
The Name's Court Supreme Court
Right so the Supreme Court a place I've visited a few times – usually when chasing villains who think hiding behind legal jargon is a good strategy – has stirred up a bit of a martini shaken not stirred of course. They've put the brakes on 'universal injunctions,' a move that seems to have given our former President Mr. Trump a rather large boost. Personally I find politics a bit like a badly made Vesper – complex and often leaving a bitter aftertaste.
A Win for Trump A Shaken Martini for Some
Apparently this whole kerfuffle started when federal judges decided to block Trump's attempt to shall we say 'reimagine' birthright citizenship. Think of it as trying to change the rules of baccarat mid game. The Supremes in a 6 3 split decided that these 'universal injunctions' were a bit too much like giving the judiciary a license to kill...executive power that is. Trump ever the showman declared it a 'GIANT WIN' – all caps naturally. The man does love his theatrics.
License to Interpret: Barrett's View
Justice Amy Coney Barrett one of Trump's appointees penned the majority opinion. She argued that federal courts shouldn't be playing general oversight of the Executive Branch. It's like saying MI6 shouldn't be meddling in well everything. A noble sentiment perhaps but where's the fun in that? After all sometimes you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet or in this case bend the rules to save the world.
Dissenting Opinions: A View to a Kill (the Executive Order)
Of course not everyone was raising a toast with Bollinger. Justice Sotomayor fired back accusing the conservatives of enabling judicial 'gamesmanship' by the Trump administration. She warned that this ruling could open the door for all sorts of shenanigans like seizing firearms or banning certain religions. Talk about a 'shameful' plot twist! It seems we have a difference in opinion regarding this 'shaken not stirred' martini some prefer it stirred instead.
Jackson's Jabs: For Your Eyes Only (If You Haven't Sued)
Justice Jackson chimed in with her own dissenting opinion suggesting that the ruling gives the Executive Branch a 'license to kill' the Constitution – but only for those who haven't filed a lawsuit yet. Seems a bit like a villain only targeting those who haven't bothered to report him to Interpol. She argued that if we want to be a nation of laws the judiciary has to stand its ground. A bit like Q standing his ground with my gadgets despite my… creative uses of them.
The World Is Not Enough (for Universal Injunctions)
So there we have it. The Supreme Court has dialed back the power of 'universal injunctions,' handing a win to Trump and sparking a debate about the balance of power. As for me I'll stick to saving the world one villain and one perfectly mixed martini at a time. After all the name's Bond James Bond and I have a world to save even from the odd Supreme Court ruling.
Comments
- No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.