
A 'Love Story' Gone Wrong?
Okay Swifties let's spill the tea. Apparently Google's been using YouTube videos – all 20 billion of 'em – to train their AI models like Gemini and Veo 3. I know right? It's like finding out your ex is using your diary for stand up material. YouTube says they're just 'making their products better,' but some experts are raising eyebrows faster than you can say 'Red (Taylor's Version).'
Are We Out of the Woods Yet? (Spoiler: Probably Not)
So YouTube claims they honor agreements with creators and only use a 'subset' of videos. But honey even 1% of 20 billion is a *lot* of content. It's like saying you only dated like three of the Jonas Brothers. Technically true but still. Experts are saying this is way more data than competing AI models use which is enough to make any creator feel like they're 'dancing with our hands tied.'
No 'Style' of Opting Out
Here's the kicker: there's no way to opt out of letting Google train on your videos. It's like being forced to listen to 'We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together' on repeat for the rest of eternity. Luke Arrigoni CEO of Loti put it perfectly: they're helping Veo 3 make a 'poor facsimile' of creators. 'That's not necessarily fair to them,' he says. No kidding!
Veo 3: 'Look What You Made Me Do'?
Remember when Google unveiled Veo 3 their fancy new AI video generator? Think cinematic scenes and Pixar like animals chatting it up. All AI generated. Cool right? Until you realize it might be trained on *your* content without your consent or compensation. It's like they're saying 'Look what you made me do,' but really *they* made *you* do it... by using your stuff! And they can't even tell us what videos of ours they are using the plot thickens...
Terms of Service: The 'All Too Well' of Legal Jargon
The terms of service are a doozy. When you upload a video you're giving YouTube a 'worldwide non exclusive royalty free sublicensable and transferable license.' Translation: they can do pretty much whatever they want with your content. It's like signing a record deal without reading the fine print – a mistake I've definitely never made *nervous laughter*.
Is It the 'End Game' or Just a 'Reputation' Reboot?
Some creators are embracing the change seeing Veo 3 as 'friendly competition.' But others are worried they're training their own replacements. Sen. Josh Hawley says we need to give creators 'powerful enforceable rights' to their images. Otherwise it's a free for all and nobody wants to see their 'Blank Space' filled by an AI doppelganger. So what now? Guess we'll just have to wait and see if this is the 'End Game' or just a chance to rebuild our 'Reputation.'
Comments
- No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.