The quantum computing race heats up, with billions poured into a technology that promises untold power but currently delivers… well, not much. Is it the next big thing or just a bunch of theoretical Heisenberg?
The quantum computing race heats up, with billions poured into a technology that promises untold power but currently delivers… well, not much. Is it the next big thing or just a bunch of theoretical Heisenberg?

A Moment? More Like a 'Breaking Bad' Moment

Alright listen up. It seems everyone and their abuela is suddenly obsessed with quantum computing. Google Microsoft Amazon the damn government – they're all throwing money at this thing like it's my blue sky. Two billion dollars in startups last year? That's a Heisenberg level of investment! But let's be honest right now it's all theoretical. Like trying to explain the Uncertainty Principle to Jesse – you get the gist but the practical application? Fuggedaboutit.

Show Me the Money! (Or at Least *Some* Money)

Under $750 million in revenue for the whole damn quantum computing industry in 2024? That's less than I made in a good month *before* I got out of the business. All this talk of breakthroughs but it's still mostly just talk. Microsoft has a chip Google's got maybe five years Amazon's got something...and IBM? Well they're planning something by 2029. That's like promising to pay back a loan in Schraderbucks – you might get it you might not. Meanwhile Nvidia’s CEO throws sand in the gears then walks it back surprised to find the markets reacted. What the hell did he expect? You poke the hornet’s nest you get stung.

Qubits: Not Your Grandma's Transistors

So what's the big deal? Qubits. Instead of simple ones and zeros these things are entangled in some quantum mechanics voodoo. It's like trying to explain chemistry to a room full of junkies – complicated and potentially explosive. These computers need to be colder than my soul to work. Absolute zero! You know what else is near absolute zero? The amount of actual useful work they're doing right now. Heisenberg indeed.

Chemistry Encryption and the End of the World

Okay so maybe they can simulate chemistry and physics. Apparently that's good for...stuff. Microsoft's vice president Krysta Svore says that even if they only use quantum computers for material science and chemistry 96% of the world's manufactured goods rely on chemistry and material science. Fine. Now here's where it gets interesting: encryption. These things can crack codes. All our precious passwords financial transactions – poof! Gone. Q Day. Sounds like a bad sequel to Judgment Day. The White House is worried and honestly so am I. Who knew chemistry could be so dangerous?

Quantum Supremacy: Benchmarking or Bullshit?

Quantum supremacy they call it. Google said they achieved it in 2019. A benchmark. Some random circuit sampling. It's like winning a race where you're the only runner – who cares? It's all abstract. They're using it to test Quantum computers. So what! In the future they say it will be used for medicine chemistry and material research. Right so what are we waiting for?

China: The New Walter White of Global Tech?

And then there's China. The boogeyman. They're gonna use quantum computers to steal our secrets. Microsoft is framing this as a race. A race against China? That's what they want you to think. Look the government is already working on post quantum encryption. But the real problem? The data already out there. The past communications. The secrets waiting to be unlocked. It's a whole new level of 'Better Call Saul.' But for now the hardware is still buggy. Error correction is the name of the game. They need a million qubits apparently. So yeah we're still a ways off. But hey at least it's entertaining to watch everyone lose their minds over it. Just don't expect me to invest. I've got better things to do... like you know teaching chemistry.


Comments

  • No comments yet. Become a member to post your comments.